Navy announces firing of USS GUARDIAN CO

The Navy announced yesterday that the commanding officer of the former minesweeper USS GUARDIAN (MCM-5) and three others have been relieved of duty following the initial investigation into the grounding of the Sasebo-based ship on a reef in the Philippines.

Former CO, Lieutenant Commander Mark Rice, XO Lieutenant Daniel Tyler, the ship’s enlisted assistant navigator and the officer of the deck at the time of the ship’s grounding were all relieved because they “did not adhere to the standard navy navigation procedures.”
LCDR Mark Rice and the others were relieved by Rear Admiral Jeffrey Harley, commander of the Sasebo, Japan-based Amphibious Force 7th Fleet. Harley cited a “loss of confidence” in Rice’s ability to command.
LCDR Rice had screened for early command and was assigned to USS GUARDIAN (MCM 5) serving as the Executive Officer in October 2011 and fleeted up to CO in December 2012. The USS GUARDIAN was run aground in January 2013.

The First Component of Naval Leadership – PERSONAL EXAMPLE

According to Commodore Matthew Calbraith Perry, “The first component of Naval leadership is personal example. Your subordinates will reflect your sincerity, enthusiasm, smart appearance, military behavior, technical competence, and coolness and courage under stress. To be an effective leader you must first look and act like one.” Perry instinctively understood this principle.

According to an Army officer who had frequent contact with him: “the commodore was blunt, yet dignified… heavy and not graceful…held in awe by the junior officers and having little to do with them, seriously courteous to others… The ship seemed to have a sense of importance because he was on board.”

From LEADERSHIP EMBODIED,
Chapter 7, Mathew Calbraith Perry
by Dr. Michael J. Crawford

Commanding Officers are responsible for Helping Prevent Suicide

In superior performing commands, Commanding Officers (COs) have written suicide prevention and crisis intervention plans that include the process for identification, referral, access to treatment and
follow-up procedures for personnel who indicate a heightened risk of suicide.
In superior commands, COs foster a command climate that supports and promotes psychological health consistent with operational stress control principles. For example:

(a) Foster unit morale and cohesion;
(b) Promote physical fitness;
(c) Provide clear direction and sense of mission;
(d) Deglamorize alcohol use;
(e) Know their Sailors;
(f) Ensure adequate time for rest;
(g) Encourage good communication;
(h) Help Sailors maintain a work-life balance;
(i) Do positive after-action reviews;
(j) Reward accomplishments;
(k) Refer early for intervention;
(l) Communicate/coordinate with mental health providers; and
(m) Reintegrate Sailors back into the unit after treatment.

Does your CO do (a) through (m)?  What are you doing to help hold him accountable to these standards?  He can’t do it all himself.  Find out where you can help.
 

In superior commands, COs provide support for those Sailors who seek help with personal problems. Access is provided to prevention, counseling and treatment programs and services supporting the early resolution of mental health, and family and personal problems that underlie suicidal behavior.
From the OPNAVINST 1720.4A HERE.

Ask to see your CO’s suicide prevention and crisis intervention plans.  It may motivate her/him to write one and comply with Navy policy.

Navy Core Values add value

Mark Miller wrote about core values on his blog – GREAT LEADERS SERVE

Paraphrasing from his blog and applying his ideas to our Navy core values, he suggests that for “Honor, Courage and Commitment” to add value, Navy leaders must:

Know the values. Share the values. Live the values.

Assuming all three of these conditions are met, he suggests that there are 10 ways that Navy Core Values add value.

1. Core Values create a common language within the Navy and among its Sailors. Once those Navy core values were established, the Navy and her Sailors began the journey to ensure the ideas and concepts were clearly understood. Publishing the words alone is NOT sufficient to add value.
2. Core Values establish norms of conduct and approach. By definition, Navy Core Values are the beliefs that we want to inform/drive the behavior within the Navy. As we continue to communicate these values, our Sailors will respond accordingly.
3. Core Values set the priorities of the organization. Not operating priorities – cultural priorities. Culture is the most powerful force in any organization – think about it, the culture of aviation, surface warfare, submarines, across the shore establishment. Navy core values, once firmly rooted, are the Navy culture.
4. Core Values, when rank ordered, establish behavioral priorities as well. Honor is first among equals.  Courage and Commitment follow.
5. Core Values can be used to screen potential employees. The Navy hires from the whole of American society and then must teach them Navy core values.  Mark Miller suggests that the Navy would be more successful if we selected people who already embodied the Navy’s core values.
6. Core Values provide a standard against which people can be evaluated. The Navy should be evaluating Sailors on both traditional performance metrics and adherence to the Navy Core Values.
7. Core Values accelerate the contribution of new Sailors. There is a natural tentativeness in Sailors when they don’t know what is valued in the Navy culture. Without overt declaration of Navy Core Values at each command, new Sailors at your command may spend many months attempting to figure them out.
8. Core Values create a platform for leaders to articulate and demonstrate what matters most. Done well, this builds the Sailors’s trust and confidence in their navy leaders.
9. Core Values provide strategic opportunities for recognition. The behavior you recognize and reward will be repeated.
10. Nothing will shape a culture faster than Navy Core Values articulated, modeled and recognized in practice.

Do all the Sailors in your organization know and practice Navy Core Values? Think about the power of getting everyone in your command aligned around what matters most.

Lieutenant Commander Seth Lawrence – 2013 Winner of Captain Joseph Rochefort Information Warfare Officer Distinguished Leadership Award

LCDR SETH LAWRENCE
CAPTAIN JOSEPH JOHN ROCHEFORT WAS A MAJOR FIGURE IN THE U.S. NAVY’S CRYPTOLOGIC AND INTELLIGENCE DEVELOPMENT FROM 1925 TO 1947. HE HEADED THE NAVY’S FLEDGLING CRYPTANALYTIC ORGANIZATION IN THE 1920’S AND PROVIDED SINGULARLY SUPERB CRYPTOLOGIC SUPPORT TO THE U.S. FLEET DURING WORLD WAR II, LEADING TO VICTORY IN THE WAR IN THE PACIFIC. AT THE END OF HIS CAREER (1942-1946), ROCHEFORT SUCCESSFULLY HEADED THE PACIFIC STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE GROUP IN WASHINGTON. ROCHEFORT DIED IN 1976. IN 1986, HE POSTHUMOUSLY RECEIVED THE PRESIDENT’S NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, THE HIGHEST MILITARY AWARD DURING PEACETIME, FOR HIS CONTRIBUTIONS DURING THE BATTLE OF MIDWAY.
THE INTENT OF THE CAPTAIN ROCHEFORT IW OFFICER DISTINGUISHED LEADERSHIP AWARD IS TO ANNUALLY RECOGNIZE THE SUPERIOR CAREER ACHIEVEMENT OF ONE IW OFFICER. IN THE SPIRIT OF CAPTAIN ROCHEFORT, SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO LEADERSHIP, TEAMWORK, OPERATIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND ADHERENCE TO THE PRINCIPLE BY WHICH HE SERVED, “WE CAN ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING PROVIDED NO ONE CARES WHO GETS THE CREDIT.”
Lieutenant Commander Seth Lawrence is currently serving as the Executive Officer of Navy Information Operations Command Pensacola, Florida.

Bad day for NOSC CO – Navy Fires CO number SEVEN

As reported by NAVNEWS, Rear Admiral Bryan Cutchen, Commander, Navy Reserve Forces Command fired Captain Jay Bowman, Commanding Officer, Navy Operational Support Center (NOSC) Fort Dix, N.J.,  on March 27, due to loss of confidence in his ability to command.
The firing was the result of an investigation that raised concerns over Captain Bowman’s ability to effectively command. 
Captain Bowman’s Executive Officer, Lieutenant Commander Derek Dwyer has assumed command on an interim basis.  
Captain Bowman is the second NOSC Commanding Officer fired this month and the seventh Navy Commanding Officer fired in 2013.
For more news from Commander, Navy Reserve Force, visit www.navy.mil/local/nrf/.

Big Day Today for my Shipmate – LCDR Mark Boggis

The Officer in Charge
United States Navy Information Operations Detachment Seoul
requests the pleasure of your company at the
Change of Charge Ceremony at which
Lieutenant Commander Julio Sanchez, United States Navy
will be relieved by
Lieutenant Commander Mark L. Boggis, United States Navy
on Friday, the twenty-ninth of March
at ten o’clock
in the South Post Chapel, Yongson Army Garrison, Bldg 3702
Seoul, Republic of Korea

Navy Fires its SIXTH Commanding Officer in 2013

NOSC Rock Island, Illinois
Navy Reserve Lieutenant Commander Jack O’Neill, Commanding Officer, Navy Operational Support Center (NOSC) Rock Island, Illinois was fired by Captain George Whitbred, Commander, Navy Region Midwest Reserve Component Command (NRWRCC).  LCDR O’Neill was fired on 19 March due to Captain Whitbred’s loss of confidence in his ability to command.

The relief occurred as the result of an investigation into allegations of hazing during a drill weekend as well as other command climate issues. LCDR O’Neill has been temporarily reassigned to the Army Garrison at Rock Island Arsenal in Rock Island, Illinois. 

LCDR O’Neill is a graduate of the Army Command & General Staff College, served aboard USS NASSAU (LHA-3 4) and with the staff at Amphibious Squadron ELEVEN.  He has a degree from Regent University.
The Navy has taken a hard turn on hazing incidents and established a Navy Office of Hazing Prevention (N137) (NAVADMIN 034/17) to track hazing incidents like the ones at NOSC Rock Island.   Our Navy fosters a culture of dignity and respect for every Sailor, and hazing has no place within our Navy culture.  Hazing prevention remains a Navy leadership priority. One incident is one too many. It is the responsibility of every Sailor to ensure that hazing does not occur in any form at any level.
LCDR Gregory Cissell, a member of NRWRCC’s staff, has been named interim CO of NOSC Rock Island until a properly command screened replacement can be named.
Other COs fired in 2013:

1.  Commander Thomas Winter: CO USS MONTPELIER – loss of confidence in his ability to command.
2.  Commander Luis Molina: CO USS PASADENA – loss of confidence in executing his duties.
3.  Commander Nathan Sukols: CO USS JACKSONVILLE – due to loss of confidence in his ability to command.
4.  Captain David Hunter: CO Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron 12, Coastal Riverine Group 2 due to “unprofessional behavior.”
5.  Commander Corey Wofford: CO USS KAUFFMAN – due to lackluster leadership.